Firangi Review: Finally Kapil Sharma failed to establish himself as an actor



Imdb Rating- 6.1/10
Rotten Tomato- 20%
Sooroo Rating-2/5


Firangi Story: The story of the film is about 1921 India of Independence. This is a low-budget period movie whose love story is extremely weak and tired and it has a little touch of patriotism.

Firangi review: One thing is clear. Through his second film, Kapil Sharma is completely proving that he does not want to be established in films on the basis of his comedy talent. Although it will be called a bold step for a successful Comedian, try it in another style, but the question is whether Kapil Sharma's fans are ready for it and can they do this effectively? Probably not, because in the whole movie there is a similar expression on their face.

It is not possible to see Kapil Sharma being a naive and romantic, romance with Ishita Dutta (who is trying to bring Amrita Rao out of her, for about 3 hours) to romance herself with a very young age . Unfortunately, this is not the only short period of the film itself.

The whole plot of this film seems to have borrowed from the film Lagaan. Like Bhuvan (Aamir Khan), the manga (Kapil Sharma) is also led by a group of villagers, who challenge English officer Mark Daniels (Edward Sounenblick, who is a copy of Lakhan's Captain Russell). Helps her in Raham Dil Shyamali (Monika Gill, sister of Lagaan's Captain Rassel like Elizabeth) Ishita Datta plays Sergey in the film, which is influenced by Lagaan's Gauri i.e. Grecy Singh's character. The British official wants to evacuate the village of Sergi for forced economic benefits.

Even if you ignore the idea of ​​being inspired by this film, it becomes extremely important that a period film should be made on a scale which has a very good authenticity. There is nothing like this in Firangi. All the villages shown in the entire film look the same and you see the same 15 people roaming everywhere in the entire movie. The clothes worn by the characters in the film and the way they speak are not correct. Those who are playing British characters are talking in the American Accent, while the clothes of Indian princess (Monika Gill) coming back from London and the way to talk is a bit more English than the British. He talks with his Indian colleagues in English, while with British colleagues in Hindi. Rogue Indian King (Kumud Mishra) is neither funny nor scary.

The only character of the film, which seems quite logical and who has worked hard on his character, is Edward Sounnblick and Anjan Srivastava who is in the role of Gandhi Bhakta. They definitely try to put something in the film. Moving on the move of the movie Firangi Turtle, the audience goes to Climax. This is a family film that is neither too glamorous nor horror. It is completely boring and there is nothing in the name of entertainment.

Comments